🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."